Showing posts with label 3. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3. Show all posts

Saturday, June 17, 2017

AMD Update 3 Current Studies for Treating Macular Degeneration


In its upcoming February 25th issue, Ocular Surgery News presents a table of ongoing clinical trials for treating age-related macular degeneration. I have reproduced the table below.

For more information on any of these, or the 186 current open trials for treating age-related macualar degeneration, please go to Clinical Trials.gov. By using the “Refine Search” tab, and putting in the name of any of the trials listed in the table into the search box, you should be able to gain more information about each.


(By right-clicking on the table image and opening in a new tab or window, a larger more readable version will appear.)



Friday, May 19, 2017

NeoVista Epi Retinal Strontium 90 Treatment for AMD Update 3


During the 2008 Retina Society Meeting, held last weekend, NeoVista, Inc. provided eighteen-month data from its Phase II feasability study of the company’s novel beta radiation epi-retinal therapy for the treatment of the wet form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The long-term data from the study, which was initiated to test the safety and efficacy of their therapy when used in conjunction with Avastin (bevacizumab), showed a marked advancement in mean visual acuity results at month 18, while only a limited number of patients required additional injections of Avastin.

The data were presented at the Retina Society Meeting by Nelson R. Sabates, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) School of Medicine and the lead investigator in NeoVista's ongoing Phase III study, CABERNET (CNV Secondary to AMD Treated with BEta RadiatioN Epiretinal Therapy).

"The data released demonstrate that NeoVista's concomitant approach has the potential to offer patients a less frequent treatment option that is just as effective, if not more effective, than the current standard of care," said Dr. Sabates. "It's highly encouraging to continually see patient outcomes improving as the study progresses."

"We're very delighted with the latest data from our Phase II study, as not only did the visual acuity improve in our patients over the long-term, but very few patients received additional injections as well," said John N. Hendrick, President and CEO of NeoVista. "The ultimate pledge of this therapy continues to be demonstrated as the long-term data hold promise in minimizing the treatment burden both for patients and physicians, not to mention the overall financial burden for the healthcare system."

NeoVista's revolutionary therapy applies a targeted dose of beta radiation to the leaking blood vessels that affect central vision; concomitantly, two injections of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent are delivered to maximize the acute therapeutic response. Preliminary data show that NeoVista's targeted radiation therapy can be safe for both the patient and the physician, and may be able to restore the patient's vision. The current standard of care for wet AMD requires persistent injections of anti-VEGF drugs for an indefinite period.

The ongoing multicenter feasibility study enrolled 34 trial participants (with a mean age of 72 years) from June 2006 to April 2007 at two centers in Brazil and one in Mexico. These patients, with predominantly classic, minimally classic, or occult (with no classic) choroidal neovascularization (CNV), received a single 24 Gy treatment of NeoVista's epiretinal brachytherapy in combination with two intravitreal injections of Avastin, one dose prior to or at the time of radiation delivery and another one month later, depending on which arm of the trial the patient was enrolled in. Additional therapy was delivered based upon the investigator's evaluation of disease activity.

Analysis of 18-month follow-up on the first 25 trial participants to reach that milestone, as shown in Graph 1 below, shows a mean improvement in visual acuity of 10.7 letters using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) test; 96 percent of patients lost 15 letters or fewer, 76 percent gained some letters, 44 percent gained 15 or more letters, and 8 percent gained 30 or more letters. Of particular interest, 68 percent of the patients in the study did not require additional injections of Avastin throughout the 18-month period and the average number of additional injections within this subset was only 2.4 injections by month 18.


Graph 1

The visual acuity data after 18 months compares favorably with the results reported after 12 months, as shown in Graph 2 below. (This graph compares the Epi-Rad treatment without Avastin (purple color), with Epi-Rad plus Avastin (blue color) and the Marina (green) and Anchor (red) studies, which both used Lucentis.)

Graph 2

For more information on the NeoVista Epi-Retinal treatment, and for further information on the Marina and Anchor Studies, see my three earlier reports on NeoVista, posted November 19, 2007; July 11, 2007; and February 14, 2007.

Most of the limited number of adverse events were related to the vitrectomy procedure (retinal tear, retinal detachment, subretinal hemorrhage, and vitreous hemorrhage), rather than the epiretinal brachytherapy. To date, no instances of radiation toxicity have been reported by the Doheny reading center.

In contrast to other forms of radiation therapy for wet AMD, NeoVista's approach delivers the peak dose of energy directly to the lesion without damaging the normal retinal vasculature. Utilizing strontium 90, the focused energy is delivered to a target area up to 3 mm in depth and up to 5.4 mm in diameter. Importantly for patients, the systemic exposure to radiation is minimal, as the effective dose to the entire body from NeoVista's epiretinal device is less than that from a typical chest x-ray.

With the continued promise of these Phase II trial results, NeoVista continues to enroll patients in the company's pivotal trial, CABERNET. CABERNET is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study that will enroll 450 subjects at 45 sites worldwide, evaluating the safety and efficacy of NeoVista's epiretinal brachytherapy delivered concomitantly with the FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapy Lucentis (ranibizumab) versus Lucentis alone.


Thursday, May 18, 2017

CATT Study Update 3 Avastin vs Lucentis – To Get Underway by Year’s End!


The following information was provided to me from the recent CATT Study training meeting held in Philadelphia.

(Please note the addended updates below.)

Patient enrollment for the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT Study) is set to begin before the end of the year, with enlistment beginning on December 1st.

The study will enroll about 1,200 patients with newly diagnosed wet AMD, randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups:

(Group1) Lucentis with four-week dosing, and after one year, re-randomization to Lucentis every four weeks or variable dosing as required based on diagnostic findings;

(Group 2) Avastin with four-week dosing, and after one year, re-randomization to Avastin every four weeks or variable dosing as required based on diagnostic findings;

(Group 3) Lucentis on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; after initial treatment, with monthly evaluation and re-treatment based on signs of lesion activity; and

(Group 4) Avastin on a variable dosing schedule for 2 years; after initial treatment, with monthly evaluation and re-treatment based on signs of lesion activity.

The regimens are based upon the fact that Avastin is generally given on a variable basis and Lucentis has only been formally tested in a fixed regimen. The main objective will be changes in visual acuity, with secondary objectives including change in lesion size, fluid found in optical coherence tomography and cost, which the study chairman, Dr. Dan Martin of Emory University emphasized is not the sole purpose of the study.

The study will follow patients for two years and will take about four years to complete. One year follow-up data will be reported in late 2009. The study will be conducted in 47 centers in the US.

NEI/NIH is emphasizing that this is more than just a cost study, and that the primary goals are to better understand the safety and efficacy of intravitreal Avastin and to develop better dosing/re-treatment guidelines for both Avastin and Lucentis.

The Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) is a set of multicenter, randomized clinical trials of treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the United States. The Lucentis-Avastin comparison trial is supported by the National Eye Institute (NEI) of the National Institute of Health (NIH).

I expect to have a list of participating centers, hopefully with contact information, by the end of this week and will attempt to put it online. If it becomes available from the University of Pennsylvania website, I will link to that source.

Update:

I now have the CATT clinical site information on 46 of the 47 sites that are believed to be interested in participating in the clinical trial. I have been asked not to publish the names until the contracts with Upenn have been signed. I plan to honor that request.

However, anyone wishing to know the names of the clinics in their state that will be recruiting patients for the study can email me (iarons(at)erols.com – or the link at the side of this page) and I will be happy to cut and paste and supply you with the names of local clinics. Just mention the state that you are interested in.

As soon as Upenn gives me the OK, I will publish the information – or link to their site if they put it online.

I have also learned, as of 10/20/07, that the CATT Study will not be effected by the recent decision by Genentech to cut off the supply of Avastin to compounding pharmacies.

UPenn will act as the compounding pharmacy and will supply the doses of Avastin needed for the study to the 47 participating clinics.